Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with a global score of 81.2 against 78.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 construction is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M20, although it was released 6 years before. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M20, because although it has lesser RAM and less CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better screen than Galaxy M20, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have a camera in the back with a 13 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy M20 features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M20 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.