Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, having an 85.6 score against 81.2. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a noticeably newer and thinner device than the Galaxy Note 3, but it's also a bit heavier.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit smaller display, a just a bit lower display pixel density and a little worse 1920 x 1080px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, it also counts with a more megapixels back-facing camera. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Note 3. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy Note 3, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.