Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is extremely newer and extremely thinner, but a lot heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, providing you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has a better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.