Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Xperia XZs, with an 81.2 score against 77.2. Even being the best device we compare here, Galaxy Note 3 is a older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier device than Xperia XZs. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little faster processor than Xperia XZs, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a GPU.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a quite larger screen. The Sony Xperia XZs features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia XZs also has a larger aperture, better 960 fps video frame rate, a way bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 64 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit longer battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.