Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting an 81.2 score against 76.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is noticeably older than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better looking screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit more powerful processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a camera with lot more MP, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.