Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-04-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, with a overall score of 81.4 against 81.2. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy Note 3. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and more 2300 MHz cores. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a bit worse pixel density and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a way bigger camera sensor, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.