Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-05-09 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, with an 81.2 score against 80.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has Android 11. Galaxy Note 3 is an notably older phone than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, but it's lighter and thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite worse screen density and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's CPU is just as good as Galaxy Note 3's processor, because although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores (although they are slower).
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 64 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 64 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.