Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F5's overall score of 78.2. The Galaxy Note 3 design is a little lighter than the Xiaomi Poco F5, although it is a little thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Xiaomi Poco F5 has Android 13.
Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a bit smaller display, a little bit less pixels per display inch and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Xiaomi Poco F5 has much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F5 features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco F5 captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.