Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting an 81.2 score against 78.2. Galaxy Note 3 is an way older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10.
Galaxy Note 3 has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little bit less pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations, a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an 88% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.