Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10.
Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a camera with a lot better resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.