Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's general score of 76.6. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Note 3's construction is a little lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but it's a little bit thicker and was released 7 years before.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little bit smaller display and a just a bit worse pixels count per screen inch.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.