Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 20, with a general score of 81.2 against 77.8. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is somewhat lighter than ZTE Axon 20, but it is a little bit thicker and was released many years before.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a brighter display than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little smaller display and a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the screen. ZTE Axon 20 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The ZTE Axon 20 features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 20 features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 20 takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a much better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and faster video frame rates.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy Note 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.