Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's general score of 78.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11 version. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is way older and just a bit thicker than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's construction is still somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a just a bit less pixels per screen inch. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way better video definition, a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy Note 3 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.