Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
SM-N7505| Global Score | |
| 70.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-01-30 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.84 x 3.05 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.73 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 759.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 Hexa chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz + Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T624 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 3 Neo's global score of 70.5. HTC U Ultra's body is notably newer and just a bit thinner, but also a little heavier than the Galaxy Note 3 Neo. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has much more pixels per inch of screen, a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite larger screen.
HTC U Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. HTC U Ultra has a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a way larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations and a much better (4K) video resolution. Galaxy Note 3 Neo counts with a bit better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC U Ultra is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.