Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Huawei |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2014-01-30 | 2017-01-10 |
| 5.84 x 3.05 x 0.34 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.73 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 759.00 | $ 775.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 Hexa chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz + Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T624 GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro is much better than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, having a 78.7 score against 70.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Huawei Mate 9 Pro has 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy Note 3 Neo has Android 4.4.2 version, providing the user some extra features. Even though Huawei Mate 9 Pro is a bit heavier than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer.
Huawei Mate 9 Pro features a faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, and although they both have a same size screen, the Huawei Mate 9 Pro also has a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way better screen pixels density.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Huawei Mate 9 Pro captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Huawei Mate 9 Pro has improved battery life than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Huawei Mate 9 Pro costs a bit more than the Galaxy Note 3 Neo, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.