Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-01-30 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.84 x 3.05 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.73 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 759.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 Hexa chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz + Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T624 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 3 Neo's global score of 70.5. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play design is newer, somewhat lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy Note 3 Neo. Moto Z2 Play has a screen that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo, and although the Moto Z2 Play has much more pixels per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px, they both have a same size display.
Moto Z2 Play features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a little faster processor than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a much better video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger aperture to take better low light images. Galaxy Note 3 Neo counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Moto Z2 Play is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.