Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
SM-N9008V| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3's global score of 81.2. LG V40 ThinQ is a notably newer and a bit thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but it's also just a little bit heavier. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, giving you a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has much less pixels per inch of display, a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.