Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
T-MobileSM-N900T
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 260.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 420 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's global score of 81.1. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is notably newer and a little thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Google Pixel 2 XL features a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy Note 3, because although the Google Pixel 2 XL has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it has a lot lower quantity of pixels in each display inch, a lot worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a bit smaller display. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3520mAh battery size. Google Pixel 2 XL has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a worse resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.