Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
T-MobileSM-N900T
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 260.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 420 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, getting a general score of 81.3 against 81.1. The LG V35 ThinQ is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little smaller screen and a lot worse display pixel density. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher 16 megapixels resolution and a much larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the Galaxy Note 3, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.