Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's overall score of 81.1. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but LG K92 has a more recent 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some nice extra features. The LG K92 is a somewhat heavier device than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but both are 0.33inches thick.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than LG K92, because although it has less cpu cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid screen than LG K92, although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a little less pixels per inch of screen and a quite smaller display.
LG K92 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG K92 counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The LG K92 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG K92 is also the cheapest one, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.