Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note 3's overall score of 81.1. The LG Velvet construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Galaxy Note 3. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better looking display than LG Velvet, although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG Velvet features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster).
The LG Velvet has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. LG Velvet takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.