Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-06-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cosmic Emerald |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 3, with an 82.1 score against 81.1. Although Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is extremely newer than Galaxy Note 3, it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a quite smaller display and a little less pixels per inch in the screen. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.