Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's score of 81.1. The Galaxy S10 is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version.
Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a display that's very similar to the Galaxy Note 3 one, although the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy S10 has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S10 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better low light photos and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy S10 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.