Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0.3, 2.3.5, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-09-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 263.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 960 hours standby time 26 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note, with an 81.3 score against 68.8. The LG V35 ThinQ body is noticeably newer, somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note, because it has a little bit larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a lot higher pixel density.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a 32% bigger battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ has a greater camera than Galaxy Note, because it has a way larger aperture, a camera with a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy Note.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.