Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note
32 GB| Global Score | |
| 68.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0.3, 2.3.5, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-09-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 263.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 960 hours standby time 26 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a lot better than Galaxy Note, getting a score of 87.1 against 68.8. The LG Velvet construction is way newer and somewhat thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Galaxy Note. The LG Velvet has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
LG Velvet counts with a display that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note's screen, although the LG Velvet also has a bigger screen, a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a way more MP back facing camera, a lot larger diafragm aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. LG Velvet has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet costs a bit more money than the Galaxy Note, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.