Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0.3, 2.3.5, 2.3.4 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2011-09-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 263.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 960 hours standby time 26 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is much better than Galaxy Note's 68.8 score. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but the Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version and Galaxy Note has Android 4.1.2 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and increased performance. The Moto Z Force is a extremely newer device, and it's also a little lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy Note.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a little larger screen, a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better pixels number per display inch. Motorola Moto Z Force features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 2 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z Force counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a 40% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a lot higher video definition, a way larger aperture to take better low light photos and video and a way more MP camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Moto Z Force is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.