Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
T-MobileSM-N910T
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, having an 87.1 score against 81.6. LG Velvet's design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 4. Galaxy Note 4 features a more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixels quantity per screen inch.
LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy Note 4 has a little bit better processing power than LG Velvet, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU.
The LG Velvet has greater battery duration than Galaxy Note 4, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh. LG Velvet shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 4, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Velvet also has a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG Velvet is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.