Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Silver |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s general score of 77.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an notably older device than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid display than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a better CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a larger aperture, a camera with a way better resolution, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 5 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.