Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 design is much newer and a little bit lighter, but just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy Note 5. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a bit greater display density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a superior performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. Google Pixel 4's storage to store more games and applications is very similar to the Galaxy Note 5 one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 also counts with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution camera.
Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.