Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Galaxy Note 5, with an 87.5 score against 79.3. These phones work with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a extremely newer and a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy Note 5, although it's also just a little thicker.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a better processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3885mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.