Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 overall score. Although Google Pixel 5 is just a little thicker than Galaxy Note 5, it's somewhat lighter and newer. The Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a quite better pixels quantity per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 5 has a quite superior performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
Google Pixel 5 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a worse video resolution and a lot lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger aperture. The Google Pixel 5 has a superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 5 costs more money than Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.