Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass; metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro, having a 79.3 score against 77. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy Note 5 construction is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Honor 50 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage.
Honor 50 Pro features a quite better performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 7 more cpu cores. The Honor 50 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Honor 50 Pro has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.