Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Sky Blue and White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than LG K62, having a global score of 79.3 against 78.2. The Galaxy Note 5 construction is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the LG K62, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a lot better looking screen than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and way more pixels per inch of screen. LG K62 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG K62 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG K62 also has 7 more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations, a much smaller sensor which offers a lot lower photo and video quality and a back camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG K62 features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.