Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Titan gray |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, getting an 85.4 score against 79.3. These phones use Android operating system, but LG K92 has the newer 10 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, giving you some extra features. LG K92's construction is much newer than the Galaxy Note 5's, but it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
LG K92 features a little faster processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display pixels density.
LG K92 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG K92 features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a way more mega-pixels camera and a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
LG K92 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy Note 5.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.