Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Holographic white |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. The Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older phone than the LG Stylo 6, but it's noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per display inch. The LG Stylo 6 has a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG Stylo 6 also has a greater number of faster cores. The LG Stylo 6 has better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a back camera with a better 16 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos and a way better (4K) video definition.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 5, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.