Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is way newer, just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy Note 5. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a bit more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a quite smaller display. The LG V35 ThinQ has a camera that is very similar to the Galaxy Note 5 one, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a 16 MP resolution camera and the same video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.