Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue and White |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Galaxy Note 5, with an 87.6 score against 79.3. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is much newer than the Galaxy Note 5, it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, counting with some extra features and increased performance.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a quite better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a larger camera aperture. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ features a superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.