Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 5, getting a general score of 87.1 against 79.3. LG Velvet's construction is notably newer, but just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy Note 5. The LG Velvet features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher screen pixels density. LG Velvet captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Velvet also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
LG Velvet features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG Velvet counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.