Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having an 89.6 score against 79.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola edge has newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Motorola edge is a way newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, although it is somewhat thicker and a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Motorola edge counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Motorola edge takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos.
The Motorola edge has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola edge has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola edge costs more than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.