Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 has a general score of 86.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, giving a lot of extra features. The Motorola Edge 20 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 features a more powerful processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The Motorola Edge 20 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 also has a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Motorola Edge 20 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.