Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than Galaxy Note 5, with a 92.8 score against 79.3. These phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has newer 12 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Even though the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is notably newer than Galaxy Note 5, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a superior performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher display density.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.