Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mineral Gray |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a general score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge (2022) has newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Motorola Edge (2022) construction is much newer and just a little bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher pixel amount per inch of display. The Motorola Edge (2022) has a superior processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge (2022) has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge (2022) shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a bigger camera aperture, better video frame rate and a way more MP back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge (2022) costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.