Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2024), with a 79.3 score against 78.5. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older device than Motorola Edge (2024), but it is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater pixels count per screen inch.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge (2024) also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge (2024) features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note 5 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.