Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy Note 5 features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 7 less processing cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and video and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 47 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.