Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having an 83.1 score against 79.3. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's design is extremely newer and a little lighter, but a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a more recent 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 7 more processing cores. Galaxy Note 5 features a much better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a quite better screen density.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a much more MP back facing camera, a larger aperture for better low light images and video and higher video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Neo has better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4020mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.