Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, with a global score of 80.9 against 79.3. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a a lot newer cellphone than Galaxy Note 5, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has newer 12 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering some nice extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Note 5 has a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Single-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.