Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a score of 79.3 against 77. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is extremely older and a little heavier than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's design is still just a bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has less RAM and lesser cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a way larger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a back camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.