Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Interstellar Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is extremely newer than the Galaxy Note 5's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, providing the user a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a much higher video definition, a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.