Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Interstellar Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s global score of 78.9. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 7 less cores.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a way better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.