Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, offering some additional features and increased performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a bit inferior pixels count per inch of screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 7 less cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video, a lot bigger sensor, a much higher resolution back facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.